On 08/28/2017 04:38 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: > On 28.08.2017 16:24, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >> >> >> On 08/28/2017 04:06 PM, David Hildenbrand wrote: >>> On 28.08.2017 10:07, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>>> From: "Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>> >>>> kvm has always supported the concept of starting in z/Arch mode so let's >>>> reflect the feature bit to the guest. >>>> >>>> Also, we change sigp set architecture to reject any request to change >>>> architecture modes. >>> >>> Hm ... this seems to imply that CZAM is always set, but what about >>> running on old user space (possibly on old hw)? Old QEMU will not enable >>> CZAM. >> >> 3 cases. >> 1. very old QEMU without user sigp >> 2. old QEMU with user sigp/without CPU model >> 3. new QEMU with user sigp/cpu model >> >> I think we agree that cases 2 and 3 should not matter at all for this kernel patch >> as the sigp is handled by QEMU. >> >> >> >> This is case 1: >>> And especially old user space will rely on SET ARCHITECTURE being >>> handled in the kernel. >> >> >> Yes, and it continues to be handled in the kernel. It is just that the guest >> will now see a different sigp return code. Before, our sigp implementation lied >> to the guest in a way that worked for Linux (we lied by saying "yes, we switched"). >> We now say "sorry, we are already in zarch mode, sigp ignored" which also works >> perfectly fine for Linux. And IMHO it is even the better choice even without >> STFLE.138 being set as it matches what an old hardware would do when in zarch mode. > > Ok, if it worked for relevant Linux versions, than it should indeed be fine. I checked back to 2006 and Linux never checked the return value for this sigp. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
