Re: [v6 08/15] mm: zero struct pages during initialization

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I believe this deserves much more detailed explanation why this is safe.
What actually prevents any pfn walker from seeing an uninitialized
struct page? Please make your assumptions explicit in the commit log so
that we can check them independently.

There is nothing prevents pfn walkers from walk over any struct pages deferred and non-deferred. However, during boot before deferred pages are initialized we have just a few places that do that, and all of those cases are fixed in this patchset.

Also this is done with some purpose which is the perfmance, right? You
have mentioned that in the cover letter but if somebody is going to read
through git logs this wouldn't be obvious from the specific commit.
So add that information here as well. Especially numbers will be
interesting.

I will add more performance data to this patch comment.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux