On 07/25/2017 04:14 PM, Steffen Maier wrote: > Scsi_cmnd is an unsuitable argument for eh_device_reset_handler(), > eh_target_reset_handler(), and eh_host_reset_handler() > which do not have the scope of one single SCSI command. > These callbacks tend to use fc_block_scsi_eh() requiring scsi_cmnd. > In order to start decoupling above eh callbacks from scsi_cmnd, > introduce a new variant of the function called fc_block_rport() > taking an fc_rport as argument. > Refactor the old fc_block_scsi_eh() to simply delegate to fc_block_rport(). > > Signed-off-by: Steffen Maier <maier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > include/scsi/scsi_transport_fc.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > Very good. I need that for my patchset as well. Martin, would it be possible to apply this independent of this patchset? It would help me a lot when redrafting my patchset. Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@xxxxxxxx> Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking hare@xxxxxxx +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
