> No. Several guest registers are shared with host registers and reloaded lazily. > For example if the floating point registers are invalid, they will be invalid > for the host (but the registers contain the guest values). > From a KVM perspective we can always turn off valid bits in case of doubts > (overindicate errors). So the current variant is certainly not perfect, but it > at least will not claim correct registers when they are incorrect. > We can certainly improve the handling in a future patch. (e.g. turn on validity > for control registers), I will have a look. > As far as I understand, that would then mean, enabling all validity flags for registers that are not shared. Makes sense. -- Thanks, David -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
