On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 12:24:28PM -0700, tndave wrote: > Thanks for doing this. > So archs can still have their own definition for dma_set_mask() if > HAVE_ARCH_DMA_SET_MASK is y? > (and similarly for dma_set_coherent_mask() when > CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_SET_COHERENT_MASK is y) > Any plan to change these? Yes, those should go away, but I'm not entirely sure how yet. We'll need some hook for switching between an IOMMU and a direct mapping (I guess that's what you want to do for sparc as well?), and I need to find the best way to do that. Reimplementing all of dma_set_mask and dma_set_coherent_mask is something that I want to move away from. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
