Re: [PATCH] perf: correct precise_ip level for s390

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Arnaldo,

On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 11:05:32AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 10:40:44AM +0200, Thomas Richter escreveu:
> > On s390 the counter and sampling facility do not support a
> > precise IP skid level and sometimes returns EOPNOTSUPP when
> > structure member precise_ip in struct perf_event_attr
> > is not set to zero.
> > 
> > On s390 commnd 'perf record -- true' fails with error EOPNOTSUPP.
> > This happens only when no events are specified on command line.
> > 
> > The functions called are
> > ...
> > --> perf_evlist__add_default
> >     --> perf_evsel__new_cycles
> >         --> perf_event_attr__set_max_precise_ip
> > 
> > The last function determines the value of structure member precise_ip
> > by invoking the perf_event_open() system call and checking the return code.
> > The first successful open is the value for precise_ip.
> > However the value is determined without setting member sample_period
> > and indicates no sampling.
> > On s390 the counter facility and sampling facility are different.
> > The above procedure determines a precise_ip value of 3 using the
> > counter facility. Later it uses the sampling facility with a value of 3
> > and fails with EOPNOTSUPP.
> > 
> > Fix this by changing function perf_evsel__new_cycles(). It is called
> > very early in the event setup. Delay the determination of
> > the value of precise_ip until the context is known. This is the case
> > when perf_evsel__config() is called.
> > Function perf_evsel__new_cycles() just marks precise_ip to be
> > determined later.
> > 
> > Also change the modifier to 'P' for maximum detected precise level.
> 
> This "Also" usually indicates that you are folding two changes into one
> patch, please break it into two, and also send it to the perf

That's usually right.  Except for the change below.  The
perf_evsel__new_cycles() function constructs a perf event selection.
The construction includes setting evsel->precise_max and specifying
the event name string.  To keep setting precise_max and the event name
in sync, the :P modifier must be set.  This should be part of the same
commit and not split into two.

> maintainers, I try to follow linux-perf-users, but you'll get usually
> faster patch processing if you send to whoever is listed in MAINTAINERS.
> 
> - Arnaldo
> 
> > Suggested-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Richter <tmricht@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Reviewed-by: Hendrik Brueckner <brueckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  tools/perf/util/evsel.c         | 7 +++----
> >  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > index ac59710..9266908 100644
> > --- a/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > +++ b/tools/perf/util/evsel.c
> > @@ -264,15 +264,14 @@ struct perf_evsel *perf_evsel__new_cycles(void)
> >  
> >  	event_attr_init(&attr);
> >  
> > -	perf_event_attr__set_max_precise_ip(&attr);
> > -
> >  	evsel = perf_evsel__new(&attr);
> >  	if (evsel == NULL)
> >  		goto out;
> >  
> > +	evsel->precise_max = 1;
> > +
> >  	/* use asprintf() because free(evsel) assumes name is allocated */
> > -	if (asprintf(&evsel->name, "cycles%.*s",
> > -		     attr.precise_ip ? attr.precise_ip + 1 : 0, ":ppp") < 0)
> > +	if (asprintf(&evsel->name, "cycles:P") < 0)
> >  		goto error_free;
> >  out:
> >  	return evsel;
> > -- 
> > 2.9.3
> > 
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-perf-users" in
> > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> 
Kind regards,
  Hendrik

-- 
Hendrik Brueckner
brueckner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx      | IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Linux on z Systems Development    | Schoenaicher Str. 220, 71032 Boeblingen


IBM Deutschland Research & Development GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Martina Koederitz
Geschaeftsfuehrung: Dirk Wittkopp
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Boeblingen
Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB 243294

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux