Re: [PATCH 2/9] timers: provide a "modern" variant of timers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> b) give the union a name (breaks any reference to timer_list->func in C code):
> 
>  +       union {
>  +               void            (*func)(struct timer_list *timer);
>  +               void            (*function)(unsigned long);
>  +       } u;

I'll look into that, as it seems a lot safer, and places outside
the timer code shouldn't really touch it (although I bet they do,
so more fixes for this series..)

> I fear this breaks lockdep output, which turns the name of
> the timer into a string that gets printed later. It should work
> when these are macros, or a macro wrapping an inline function
> like __init_timer is.

Ok, I'll fix it up.  Although this macro mess isn't really readable
at all.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux