* Thomas Garnier <thgarnie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > BTW., a further simplification would be: > > > > #ifndef ADDR_LIMIT_CHECK_PRE > > # define ADDR_LIMIT_CHECK_PRE ... > > #endif > > > > This way architectures could override this generic functionality simply by > > defining the helpers. Architectures that don't do that get the generic version. > > I don't think architectures need to do that. The optimizations are > embedding the checks on their architecture-specific code to make it > faster and remove the size impact. The pre/post is fine for the rest. Indeed, only the generic code needs to turn off that code - architectures will place these callbacks elsewhere. Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
