[snip]
> >>>
> >>> static int __init crash_save_vmcoreinfo_init(void)
> >>> {
> >>> + /* One page should be enough for VMCOREINFO_BYTES under all archs */
> >> Can we add a comment in the VMCOREINFO_BYTES header file about the one
> >> page assumption?
> >>
> >> Or just define the VMCOREINFO_BYTES as PAGE_SIZE instead of 4096
> > Yes, I considered this before, but VMCOREINFO_BYTES is also used by VMCOREINFO_NOTE_SIZE
> > definition which is exported to sysfs, also some platform has larger page size(64KB), so
> > I didn't touch this 4096 value.
> >
> > I think I should use kmalloc() to allocate both of them, then move this comment to Patch3
> > kimage_crash_copy_vmcoreinfo().
>
> But on the other hand, using a separate page for them seems safer compared with
> using frequently-used slab, what's your opinion?
I feel current page based way is better.
For 64k page the vmcore note size will increase it seems fine. Do you
have concern in mind?
Thanks
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
