2017-04-11 14:42+0200, Christian Borntraeger: > On 04/07/2017 02:01 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > > > Indeed this looks like a bug (and the right fix). > > > > This was not noticed during test since KVM enables the host management of > > registers and we do not use the sdnx. So for the KVM under KVM case this > > does not matter. Still, we should fix it. > > > > Radim, Paolo, do you want a respin of the whole series or can I simply send > > a fixup patch with the next round of patches? > > Radim, Paolo, > > is it ok to schedule the fixup patch for the next round of patches(I plan to > have some more for 4.12 anyway) and apply this series as is? I have not noticed the bottom hunk on Friday and waited before asking, sorry. Pulled now, the new capability numbers are #define KVM_CAP_S390_GS 140 #define KVM_CAP_S390_AIS 141 Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
