Re: [PATCH 0/5] s390/pci: Fine-tuning for three function implementations

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] s390/pci: Fine-tuning for three function implementations
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:55:48 +0300
Cc: linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Gerald Schäfer <gerald.schaefer@xxxxxxxxxx>, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, Sebastian Ott <sebott@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, LKML <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, kernel-janitors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <f2233afd-bc54-0697-0709-9577e96fc6a6@users.sourceforge.net>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)

You should compile test your patches...  No one should have to explain
that.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

References:
- [PATCH 0/5] s390/pci: Fine-tuning for three function implementations
  - From: SF Markus Elfring

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] KVM: s390: Move two error code assignments in kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log()
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 4/5] s390/pci: Move an assignment for the variable "ret" in s390_pci_mmio_write()
Previous by thread: [PATCH 5/5] s390/pci: Move two assignments for the variable "ret" in get_pfn()
Next by thread: [patch net-next] smc: some potential use after free bugs
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Development] [Kernel Newbies] [IDE] [Security] [Git] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite Info] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux ATA RAID] [Samba] [Linux Media] [Device Mapper]

Powered by Linux