[PATCH 0896/1285] Replace numeric parameter like 0444 with macro

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I find that the developers often just specified the numeric value
when calling a macro which is defined with a parameter for access permission.
As we know, these numeric value for access permission have had the corresponding macro,
and that using macro can improve the robustness and readability of the code,
thus, I suggest replacing the numeric parameter with the macro.

Signed-off-by: Chuansheng Liu <chuansheng.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Baole Ni <baolex.ni@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_sys.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_sys.c b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_sys.c
index 692db49..926d584 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_sys.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l2_sys.c
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@ static ssize_t qeth_bridge_port_role_store(struct device *dev,
 	return rc ? rc : count;
 }
 
-static DEVICE_ATTR(bridge_role, 0644, qeth_bridge_port_role_show,
+static DEVICE_ATTR(bridge_role, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, qeth_bridge_port_role_show,
 		   qeth_bridge_port_role_store);
 
 static ssize_t qeth_bridge_port_state_show(struct device *dev,
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ static ssize_t qeth_bridge_port_state_show(struct device *dev,
 	return qeth_bridge_port_role_state_show(dev, attr, buf, 1);
 }
 
-static DEVICE_ATTR(bridge_state, 0444, qeth_bridge_port_state_show,
+static DEVICE_ATTR(bridge_state, S_IRUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH, qeth_bridge_port_state_show,
 		   NULL);
 
 static ssize_t qeth_bridgeport_hostnotification_show(struct device *dev,
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static ssize_t qeth_bridgeport_hostnotification_store(struct device *dev,
 	return rc ? rc : count;
 }
 
-static DEVICE_ATTR(bridge_hostnotify, 0644,
+static DEVICE_ATTR(bridge_hostnotify, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH,
 			qeth_bridgeport_hostnotification_show,
 			qeth_bridgeport_hostnotification_store);
 
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static ssize_t qeth_bridgeport_reflect_store(struct device *dev,
 	return rc ? rc : count;
 }
 
-static DEVICE_ATTR(bridge_reflect_promisc, 0644,
+static DEVICE_ATTR(bridge_reflect_promisc, S_IRUSR | S_IWUSR | S_IRGRP | S_IROTH,
 			qeth_bridgeport_reflect_show,
 			qeth_bridgeport_reflect_store);
 
-- 
2.9.2

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux