Re: [PATCH v2] s390: ensure that syscall arguments are properly masked on s390

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:37:59AM -0400, Paul Moore wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:34 AM, Paul Moore <pmoore@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > From: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > When executing s390 code on s390x the syscall arguments are not
> > properly masked, leading to some malformed audit records.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul Moore <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >  arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c |   10 +++++++---
> >  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> The only change between v2 and the original patch is the use of
> is_compat_task() instead of the #ifdef, as suggested by Heiko.  Like
> before, I've added this patch to the audit#next branch; I think we
> have sorted all the feedback, but if any objections remain please let
> me know.

Thanks!

Acked-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux