On 03/05/2016 09:00, Christian Borntraeger wrote: >>> >> + vcpu_reset_wakeup(vcpu); >> > >> > Why mark the next wakeup as a non-sucessful poll? > It is basically only used for s390 and used as a mean to implement the "default off, > only on for selected cases". But yes, if somebody else wants to use it this might > need to be changed. > So what about changing this into > kvm_arch_vcpu_block_finish(vcpu) > which is a reset on s390 and a no for others? I think this is okay as is. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
