2016-05-03 14:37+0200, Christian Borntraeger: > Some wakeups should not be considered a sucessful poll. For example on > s390 I/O interrupts are usually floating, which means that _ALL_ CPUs > would be considered runnable - letting all vCPUs poll all the time for > transactional like workload, even if one vCPU would be enough. > This can result in huge CPU usage for large guests. > This patch lets architectures provide a way to qualify wakeups if they > should be considered a good/bad wakeups in regard to polls. > > For s390 the implementation will fence of halt polling for anything but > known good, single vCPU events. The s390 implementation for floating > interrupts does a wakeup for one vCPU, but the interrupt will be delivered > by whatever CPU checks first for a pending interrupt. We prefer the > woken up CPU by marking the poll of this CPU as "good" poll. > This code will also mark several other wakeup reasons like IPI or > expired timers as "good". This will of course also mark some events as > not sucessful. As KVM on z runs always as a 2nd level hypervisor, > we prefer to not poll, unless we are really sure, though. > > This patch successfully limits the CPU usage for cases like uperf 1byte > transactional ping pong workload or wakeup heavy workload like OLTP > while still providing a proper speedup. > > This also introduced a new vcpu stat "halt_poll_no_tuning" that marks > wakeups that are considered not good for polling. > > Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: David Matlack <dmatlack@xxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@xxxxxxxxx> > --- Thanks for all explanations, Acked-by: Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@xxxxxxxxxx> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
