* Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Why? Each syscall already is killable as the task might be killed by the OOM > > > killer. > > > > Not all syscalls are interruptible - for example sys_sync() isn't: > > I guess we are talking past each other. [...] Heh, you are being polite, I think what happened is that I was being dense and didn't understand your point: > [...] What I meant was that while all syscalls are allowed to not return to the > userspace because the task might get killed but not all of them accept to get > interrupted by a signal and return with EINTR. None of the man page of mmap, > mremap, mlock, mprotect list EINTR as a possibility so I would be really afraid > of returning an unexpected error code. Indeed. > Does this make more sense now? It does! Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
