Re: [PATCH v2 resend 6/6] arm64: switch to relative exception tables

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 11:55:23 +0100 Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Instead of using absolute addresses for both the exception location
> and the fixup, use offsets relative to the exception table entry values.
> Not only does this cut the size of the exception table in half, it is
> also a prerequisite for KASLR, since absolute exception table entries
> are subject to dynamic relocation, which is incompatible with the sorting
> of the exception table that occurs at build time.
> 
> This patch also introduces the _ASM_EXTABLE preprocessor macro (which
> exists on x86 as well) and its _asm_extable assembly counterpart, as
> shorthands to emit exception table entries.

checkpatch speaketh truth:

ERROR: #define of 'ARCH_HAS_RELATIVE_EXTABLE' is wrong - use Kconfig variables or standard guards instead
#113: FILE: arch/arm64/include/asm/uaccess.h:56:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux