Thx, Dave! "net" and "stable" are exactly my intended trees for this patch. "next-tree" has been my spelling error; I meant "net-tree". Sorry for that! -------- Forwarded Message -------- > From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > To: ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > Cc: mschwid2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, heicars2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-s390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, > ubraunu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Date: 19/01/2016 20:24 > Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/1] af_iucv: Validate socket address > length in iucv_sock_bind() > Sent by: linux-s390-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > ______________________________________________________________________ > > > > From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 10:41:32 +0100 > > > this patch fixes a problem reported by Dmitry Vyukov in december. It > is built > > and intended for the next-tree. > > A bug fix is not appropriate for the next tree. > > All bug fixes should target 'net'. You even contacted me privately > asking me to queue this up for -stable. Submitting something for > net-next and wanting a -stable backport is doubly inappropriate. > > Things don't go to -stable unless it's in Linus's tree. 'net' is > for bug fixes, 'net-next' (closed right now) is for new features, > cleanups, and fixes to code only present in 'net-next'. > > Anyways I applied this to 'net' and queued it up for -stable. > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" > in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
