Re: [PATCH] Rename is_compat_task to in_compat_syscall

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 01:47:24PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> Essentially all users of is_compat_task in the kernel are trying to
> determine whether they are executing in the context of a compat
> syscall.  On at least x86_64 and sparc, these are not at all the
> same question.
> 
> On x86_64 and sparc, therefore, is_compat_task doesn't return the
> overall compat state of the task; it returns true if the task is
> currently in a compat syscall.

The hell it does.  Andy, TIF_32BIT is *NOT* set on syscall entry; it is
set by execve().  And 64bit task (with that bit clear) can bloody well
issue 32bit syscalls.  Really.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux