On 19/11/15 09:37, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> From: David Hildenbrand <dahi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Let's provide a function to lookup a VCPU by id.
>
> Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Dominik Dingel <dingel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <dahi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@xxxxxxxxxx>
> [split patch from refactoring patch]
> ---
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 11 +++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index 5706a21..b9f345f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -460,6 +460,17 @@ static inline struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_get_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, int i)
> (vcpup = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, idx)) != NULL; \
> idx++)
>
> +static inline struct kvm_vcpu *kvm_lookup_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, int id)
> +{
> + struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> + int i;
> +
> + kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm)
> + if (vcpu->vcpu_id == id)
> + return vcpu;
> + return NULL;
> +}
> +
Any chance that you name this function differently? Otherwise we've got
two functions that sound very similar and also have similar prototypes:
- kvm_get_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, int i)
- kvm_lookup_vcpu(struct kvm *kvm, int id)
I'm pretty sure this will cause confusion in the future!
==> Could you maybe name the new function something like
"kvm_lookup_vcpu_by_id" or "kvm_get_vcpu_by_id" instead?
Also a short comment before the function would be nice to make the
reader aware of the difference (e.g. when hot-plugging) between the
vcpu-id and array-id.
Otherwise: +1 for finally having a proper common function for this!
Thomas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
