Re: [PATCH v5 1/8] perf: Add a flags parameter to pmu txn interfaces

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Peter Zijlstra [peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] wrote:
| 
| when looking at this (I almost pressed A for apply) it occurred to me
| that we now keep double state, cpuhw->txn_flags and cpuhw->group_flag
| are basically the same thing.
| 
| Would not something like the below avoid this duplication?

Yes, it makes sense to drop the duplication. Will similarly drop the usage
of PERF_EVENT_TXN from other architectures too and try it out.

Thanks,

Sukadev

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux