I went digging through some of Markus's old patch history, and noticed this... On Mon, Nov 03, 2014 at 12:50:59PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > This one is buggy. > > I'm sorry, but please stop sending these. I'm tending to concur. > For kfree(), at least we all know that kfree() accepts NULL pointer. > But for this one: > 1) I don't know what the functions do so I have to look at the code. > 2) It's in a arch that I don't compile so cscope isn't set up meaning > it's hard to find the functions. > > You're sending a lot of patches and they are all hard to review and some > of them are buggy and none of them really add any value. It's a waste > of your time and it's a waste of my time. And you're still sending buggy patches that exhibit the same qualities. They're still wasting Dan's time, and now they're wasting mine. I appreciate automated checkers where they provide added value, but I really feel you haven't done your diligence on them. Regards, Brian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
