On Sat, 03 Jan 2015 11:44:04 +0800 Chen Gang <gang.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Thank you for your work. > > In honest, originally, I was not sure whether it would cause bug (do not > know gcc would generic incorrect code for it). :-) Even if the code happened to be correct it does not matter. The intention of the sizeof() has been to get to the correct 16, not 8. The fix is fine as it is. -- blue skies, Martin. "Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
