Re: [RFC][patch 3/6] KVM: s390: Add GISA support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 12:52:26PM +0200, frank.blaschka@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> +void kvm_s390_gisa_register_alert(struct kvm *kvm, u32 gisc)
> +{
> +	int bito = BITS_PER_BYTE * 7 + gisc;
> +
> +	set_bit(bito ^ (BITS_PER_LONG - 1), &kvm->arch.iam);
> +}

Just a very minor nit: you could also use set_bit_inv() & friends.

> +static inline u64 kvm_s390_get_base_disp_rxy(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	u32 x2 = (vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipa & 0x000f);
> +	u32 base2 = vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb >> 28;
> +	u32 disp2 = ((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0x0fff0000) >> 16) +
> +		((vcpu->arch.sie_block->ipb & 0xff00) << 4);
> +
> +	return (base2 ? vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[base2] : 0) +
> +		(x2 ? vcpu->run->s.regs.gprs[x2] : 0) + (u64)disp2;
> +}

Not very readable ;) However.. for the RXY instruction format the 20 bit
displacement is usually signed and not unsigned like your code seems to
treat it.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux