Il 21/07/2014 09:47, Christian Borntraeger ha scritto: > So having such a state wont buy us much. It would be even wrong, because > we want our MP_STATE defines to be a 1:1 match of the states that are defined > in the architecture as proper CPU states. Some of the SIGP calls will return the > state of the target CPU and that depends on the CPU state as defined in the > architecture. The wait bit does not have an influence on the return value. Thanks for the explanation. Paolo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
