On Mon, 2014-02-17 at 09:20 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote: > On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 06:15:27PM +0100, Paul Bolle wrote: > No, I want to keep them, so there is a config symbol for each cpu generation > and we don't have to add the config symbols again, if we actually use them. Yes, that's the idea: only add Kconfig symbols that you are actually going to use. > It's a question of completeness in this case, not if they are being used. Completeness of what? Anyhow, perhaps you can comment this stuff out if you want to have it in the tree. See, these symbols will pop up each time that people run their scripts to discover problems in the kconfig space. I suppose this was probably not the first time these two were reported. And people not aware of this thread might do that again, and again... Thanks, Paul Bolle -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html