On 10/11/2013 06:44 PM, Will Deacon wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 02:18:26AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote: >> On 10/10/2013 10:23 PM, Will Deacon wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 12:03:52PM +0100, Chen Gang wrote: >>>> BTW: do arm64 need atomic_clear_mask()? >>> >>> No. Neither ARM nor arm64 need this function. >> >> OK, thank you for your confirmation. >> >> Hmm... can we remove atomic_clear_mask() from ARM and arm64? (in my >> opinion, if not need, better to remove it). > > Yes! > OK, thanks. > I mentioned this a few times already... > Hmm... firstly, you mentioned "except architectures, this is only used under s390" (so I reply we need follow s390), and then you mentioned "they are useless for arm/arm64" (so I ask whether it can be removed). Excuse me, as a 'programmer' (at least, I am a 'programmer'), when programming (assume our discussing belongs to programming), I have to consider precisely (especially for confirmation words). ;-) I will send one patch for removing it from arm and arm64. Thanks. > Will > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > Thanks. -- Chen Gang -- Chen Gang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
