Il 03/07/2013 11:05, Paolo Bonzini ha scritto: > Nice idea, though I don't really like the duplication between > kvm_io_bus_write and kvm_io_bus_write_cookie. > > Can you make kvm_io_bus_write, and perhaps kvm_io_bus_read too, return > the cookie, and return -EINVAL here if the cookie is garbage? On second though---no need to return -EINVAL, you can just pass the cookie by value and tail-call kvm_io_bus_write. Whatever makes the s390 code look nicer. Paolo > (Unfortunately, most callers of kvm_io_bus_read/write expect them to > never return a value that is >= 0, but there aren't many so it's easily > solved). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
