Re: [PATCH 0/3] s390/kvm fixes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 10:46:00PM +0200, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:41:21PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > On 29/01/13 14:12, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 03:34:14PM +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> > >> Gleb, Marcelo,
> > >>
> > > Alex, can you review?
> > 
> > Last time I checked, Cornelia and myself were s390/kvm/kernel maintainers ;-)
> Sorry, by bad :)
> 
> > Alex is maintainer for s390/kvm/qemu. 
> > If the patch introduces or touched an kernel<->qemu interface, I usually try
> > to come to a conclusion with Alex before submission, but these patches are
> > only bugfixes and Alex is probably pretty busy working the last day before
> > qemus hard freeze for 1.4.
> > 
> Got it.
> 
> The question about 1/1. It is CCed to stable, does this mean you want it
> to go to 3.8? kvm-next is for 3.9.
> 
On the second thought, if it is not a regression 3.9 is the right place.

--
			Gleb.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux