On 17.01.2013, at 17:20, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 15:05:46 +0000
> Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On 17 January 2013 14:23, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Base is kvm-next as of 2013/01/16.
>>
>>> --- a/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/kvm_para.h
>>> +++ b/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/kvm_para.h
>>> @@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch_shared {
>>>
>>> #define KVM_HCALL_TOKEN(num) _EV_HCALL_TOKEN(EV_KVM_VENDOR_ID, num)
>>>
>>> -#include <asm/epapr_hcalls.h>
>>> +#include <uapi/asm/epapr_hcalls.h>
>>
>> This is reintroducing a bug, isn't it? cf
>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2012-12/msg02807.html
>>
>> (maybe this just means the sync needs to be against some
>> different set of kernel headers?)
>>
>> -- PMM
>>
>
> Hm, I seem to have some stale copy here - will check.
No, the problem is that the fix went into master, but you were probably basing off of next. This is the way Linus envisions Linux development. Next is always a broken tree.
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
