On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 06:32:15PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote: > We don't call __add_pages() directly in the function add_memory() > because some other architecture related things need to be done > before or after calling __add_pages(). So we should introduce > a new function arch_remove_memory() to revert the things > done in arch_add_memory(). > > Note: the function for s390 is not implemented(I don't know how to > implement it for s390). There is no hardware or firmware interface which could trigger a hot memory remove on s390. So there is nothing that needs to be implemented. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
