Re: [PATCH RFC V2 2/2] kvm PLE handler: Choose better candidate for directed yield

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/11/2012 02:20 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:

* Raghavendra K T<raghavendra.kt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  wrote:

--- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
@@ -1595,6 +1595,9 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *me)
  				continue;
  			if (waitqueue_active(&vcpu->wq))
  				continue;
+			if (!kvm_arch_vcpu_check_and_update_eligible(vcpu)) {
+				continue;
+			}

Saw this fly by for a second time and now it annoyed me enough
to mention it: those curly braces are superfluous and should be
dropped.


Oops! Sorry.will remove {} and resend with Rik's reviewed-by. TBH,
block got simplified after iterations (local), this one leftout. my
mistake.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux