On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 16:52:56 +0200 Alexander Graf <agraf@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 26.06.2012, at 16:06, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > > From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Only if the sensed cpu is not running a status is stored, which > > is reflected by condition code 1. If the cpu is running, condition > > code 0 should be returned. > > Just the opposite of what the code is doing. > > > > Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Yikes. Is this a stable candidate? This code will only hit when running on a host running virtualized itself (where sigp sense running will cause an intercept), so I doubt many people will see the effects. Cornelia -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
