Hello Vivek, On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 14:55 -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:08:07AM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote: > > Hello Vivek, > > > > > Generally vmcore parses elfcorehdr to figure out the sizes. kexec-tools > > > knows about it and relevant memory is excluded from second kernel's map > > > with the help of memmap= command line option. > > > > > > Can you please mention that this is only s390 specific requirement as > > > there are no memmap= equivalent options and somehow dump tools wants > > > to know how big the elf header size is? > > > > I updated the description: > > > > Currently only the address of the pre-allocated ELF header is passed with > > the elfcorehdr= kernel parameter. In order to reserve memory for the header > > in the 2nd kernel also the size is required. Current kdump architecture > > backends use different methods to do that, e.g. x86 uses the memmap= kernel > > parameter. On s390 there is no easy way to transfer this information. > > Therefore the elfcorehdr kernel parameter is extended to also pass the size. > > This now can also be used as standard mechanism by all future kdump > > architecture backends. > > > > The syntax of the kernel parameter is extended as follows: > > > > elfcorehdr=[size[KMG]@]offset[KMG] > > > > This change is backward compatible because elfcorehdr=size is still allowed. > > > > Ok? > > Yes, this one looks ok. With that description change: Do I get an "Acked-by" for this patch from you? Michael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html