Re: s390 && user_enable_single_step() (Was: odd utrace testing results on s390x)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 01/05, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> I'll add clear_bit(TIF_SINGLE_STEP) into do_fork() path and re-test.

Hmm. This patch

	--- kernel/fork.c~	2009-12-22 10:41:53.188084961 -0500
	+++ kernel/fork.c	2010-01-05 11:42:58.370636323 -0500
	@@ -1206,6 +1206,8 @@ static struct task_struct *copy_process(
		 * of CLONE_PTRACE.
		 */
		clear_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
	+	clear_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_SINGLE_STEP);
	+	user_disable_single_step(p);
	 #ifdef TIF_SYSCALL_EMU
		clear_tsk_thread_flag(p, TIF_SYSCALL_EMU);
	 #endif

doesn't help, I still see the same XXX's in dmesg...

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux