Re: [PATCH] s390: ptrace: don't abuse PT_PTRACED

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 09, 2009 at 08:46:51PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> Untested, but hopefully trivial enough and should't change the
> compiled code.
> 
> Nobody except ptrace itself should use task->ptrace or PT_PTRACED
> directly, change arch/s390/kernel/traps.c to use the helper.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Acked-by: Roland McGrath <roland@xxxxxxxxxx>

> -	if ((current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) != 0)
> +	if (tracehook_consider_fatal_signal(current, SIGTRAP))
>  		force_sig(SIGTRAP, current);

Thanks, applied. Even though I'm wondering why tracehook_consider_fatal_signal
has a signal parameter and doesn't do anything with it.
Is that something that will change with utrace?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux