Re: [patch 0/2] af_iucv patches for linux-2.6.31

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 09:04:26 +0200

> Hi David,
> 
> On Thu, 18 Jun 2009 11:19:57 -0700 (PDT)
> David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2009 14:44:54 +0200
>> 
>> > sorry, I did a git pull on linux-2.6.git first, and the af_iucv patches
>> > applied cleanly on my system.
>> 
>> It couldn't have applied to Linus's tree because all the IUCV
>> bits you submitted to me for 2.6.31 are in his tree and that is
>> what created the conflicts.
> 
> Now I am confused. I just tested the two patches Uschi sent with todays
> upstream tree. The patches apply fine. Where is the problem, wrong tree?

Weird, I just retried and they do apply cleanly.

I have no idea what happened, sorry.

They are in my tree now, thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux