On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:49:43AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 06:28:32PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 08:46:30 -0700, > > Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > @@ -529,7 +529,7 @@ cio_validate_subchannel (struct subchann > > > } > > > mutex_init(&sch->reg_mutex); > > > /* Set a name for the subchannel */ > > > - snprintf (sch->dev.bus_id, BUS_ID_SIZE, "0.%x.%04x", schid.ssid, > > > + snprintf (dev_name(&sch->dev), BUS_ID_SIZE, "0.%x.%04x", schid.ssid, > > > schid.sch_no); > > > > > > /* > > > > This hunk does not make much sense. Better just leave it alone until > > the dev_set_name()/init_name conversion later. > > You are right. > > 390 maintainers, can you drop this hunk, or do you want me to respin it > and the other 3 patches (if needed)? Please resend, since patch 2 needs to be changed as well, right? Thanks! :) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
