Re: [patch 0/6] Guest page hinting version 6.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 13 Mar 2008, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> 
> My other concern is just correctness over time on the Linux side.  We already
> have enough trouble keeping things like the pte and page structure state in
> sync, with resulting rare data-loss bugs.  Adding another layer which only
> applies in specific environments raises the possibility for new bugs to be
> un-noticed for a long time.  How can we structure the VM changes to make sure
> that its robust in the face of maintenance?

Yes, that's the main concern, as whenever lots of subtlety is added.
I wonder if there's any chance of a CONFIG_DEBUG mode, which could be
run on anybody's x86 machine, without involving any virtualization, but
in which the PAGE_STATEs become essential to the correct working of the mm.

Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux