Re: [patch 2/6] CONFIG_HIGHPTE vs. sub-page page tables.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2007-10-26 at 18:00 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> > > Interesting. That means I don't need to have a PTE page to be a struct
> > > page anymore ? I can have good use for that on powerpc as well... 
> > 
> > That would be good news. I'm curious, can you elaborate on what the use
> > case is?
> 
> When using 64K pages, we use 32K of PTEs and 32K of "extension". The
> extension thing is used when using HW 4K pages, to keep track of the
> subpages. On setups where that isn't needed, we can save memory by
> allocating half pages...

Ahh, that is exactly the same reason as for s390. Page tables with a
size that is sub-page.

-- 
blue skies,
  Martin.

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux