Re: [PATCH] dasd_eer: use mutex instead of semaphore

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, May 18, 2007 at 11:55:04AM +0000, Jan Glauber wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 20:41 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
> > 
> > Index: linux-2.6/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eer.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eer.c	2007-05-13 16:56:38.000000000 +0200
> > +++ linux-2.6/drivers/s390/block/dasd_eer.c	2007-05-13 16:57:52.000000000 +0200
> > @@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
> >  #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> >  #include <linux/device.h>
> >  #include <linux/poll.h>
> > +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> >  
> >  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> >  #include <asm/semaphore.h>
> 
> Guess the include for semaphore.h could be removed too.

Yes, that'd probably make sense.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-s390" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Development]     [Kernel Newbies]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite Info]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux