On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 01:54:42PM +0100, Alexandre Belloni wrote: >On 13/02/2025 21:35:50+0800, Peng Fan wrote: >> >Well, yes, you have your answer here, if the firmware knows RTC1 is more >> >accurate and will be your source of truth, then simply use this one. >> >> But issue is RTC1 is only readable to Linux non-safety, Linux not able >> to set alarm. Linux could only use RTC0 for alarm with current i.MX95 EVK >> firmware. >> >> If RTC1 could be exported to linux for control, we could for sure >> switch to using RTC1 without caring about RTC0. But this is not true. >> >> RTC0 is free for linux to control, RTC1 not. Switching to RTC1 will make >> us lose RTC alarm to wake up linux feature. >> > >This doesn't make any sense, this limitation is on your firmware side, >either RTC1 has alarm support and the firmware can set the alarm for >linux or it doesn't and then, the firmware must set the time and alarm >on RTC0. ok. I thought to export both RTCs to Linux if both are configured for linux usage. From the discussion, I suppose you prefer linux only use one RTC. Let me try to update the rtc bbm driver to use RTC1 when RTC1 is exposed to Linux for usage. If RTC1 is not exposed for Linux, use RTC0. Regards Peng. > >-- >Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin >Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering >https://bootlin.com
