Re: [PATCH v1] rtc: rtc-asm9260: Switch to use dev_err_probe()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 28/08/2024 14:25, Yang Ruibin wrote:
> use dev_err_probe() instead of dev_err() to simplify the error path and
> standardize the format of the error code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yang Ruibin <11162571@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c | 6 ++----
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
> index a83b47e0d..2b7058ebb 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-asm9260.c
> @@ -268,10 +268,8 @@ static int asm9260_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  		return PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
>  
>  	ret = clk_prepare_enable(priv->clk);
> -	if (ret) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "Failed to enable clk!\n");
> -		return ret;
> -	}
> +	if (ret)
> +		return dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to prepare clk!\n");
>  

There is little simplification here, plus this cannot really defer. I
think it would be fine as part of other cleanups but as standalone
single patch I see no benefits of this.

Best regards,
Krzysztof





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux