On 28/05/2024 18:01, Frank Li wrote: >>> +required: >>> + - compatible >>> + - reg >>> + - interrupts >>> + - fsl,rcpm-wakeup >>> + >> >> Missing allOf with ref to rtc.yaml. >> >>> +unevaluatedProperties: false >> >> becauase otherwise above does not make much sense... unless this is not >> a RTC? > > Sorry! which one doesn't make sense? I suppose not "unevaluatedProperties". > unevaluated does not make sense on its own. For some rationale or background see example-schema, writing bindings or my old slides. Best regards, Krzysztof
