Re: [PATCH] rtc: tps6594: Add power management support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Richard,

kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:

[auto build test WARNING on abelloni/rtc-next]
[also build test WARNING on lee-mfd/for-mfd-next lee-leds/for-leds-next lee-mfd/for-mfd-fixes linus/master v6.9 next-20240513]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Richard-Genoud/rtc-tps6594-Add-power-management-support/20240514-003053
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/abelloni/linux.git rtc-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240513162942.68484-1-richard.genoud%40bootlin.com
patch subject: [PATCH] rtc: tps6594: Add power management support
config: sparc-randconfig-r081-20240514 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240514/202405141408.o5jSp8nU-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/config)
compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 13.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240514/202405141408.o5jSp8nU-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@xxxxxxxxx>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202405141408.o5jSp8nU-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/

All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6594.c:471:12: warning: 'tps6594_rtc_suspend' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
     471 | static int tps6594_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
         |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6594.c:439:12: warning: 'tps6594_rtc_resume' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
     439 | static int tps6594_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
         |            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


vim +/tps6594_rtc_suspend +471 drivers/rtc/rtc-tps6594.c

   438	
 > 439	static int tps6594_rtc_resume(struct device *dev)
   440	{
   441		struct tps6594 *tps = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
   442		struct rtc_device *rtc_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
   443		int ret;
   444	
   445		ret = regmap_test_bits(tps->regmap, TPS6594_REG_INT_STARTUP,
   446				       TPS6594_BIT_RTC_INT);
   447		if (ret < 0) {
   448			dev_err(dev, "failed to read REG_INT_STARTUP: %d\n", ret);
   449			goto out;
   450		}
   451	
   452		if (ret > 0) {
   453			/*
   454			 * If the alarm bit is set, it means that the IRQ has been
   455			 * fired. But, the kernel may not have woke up yet when it
   456			 * happened. So, we have to clear it.
   457			 */
   458			ret = regmap_write(tps->regmap, TPS6594_REG_RTC_STATUS,
   459					   TPS6594_BIT_ALARM);
   460			if (ret < 0)
   461				dev_err(dev, "error clearing alarm bit: %d", ret);
   462	
   463			rtc_update_irq(rtc_dev, 1, RTC_IRQF | RTC_AF);
   464		}
   465	out:
   466		disable_irq_wake(tps->irq_rtc);
   467	
   468		return 0;
   469	}
   470	
 > 471	static int tps6594_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev)
   472	{
   473		struct tps6594 *tps = dev_get_drvdata(dev->parent);
   474	
   475		enable_irq_wake(tps->irq_rtc);
   476	
   477		return 0;
   478	}
   479	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Sound]     [ALSA Users]     [ALSA Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Media]     [Kernel]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Media]

  Powered by Linux