On Thu, Mar 14, 2024 at 11:33:44AM +0800, jianbinz wrote: > If the alarm is triggered before the driver gets probed, the alarm > interrupt will be missed and it won't be detected, so clear the > stale interrupt in probe. > > Changes in v3: The change log goes below the '---' line below. > *clear the interrupt in driver probe > > Changes in v2: > *Adapt the V1 patch according to the newest rtc-pm8xxx > link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/20240124024023df15ef6e@mail.local/ > > Changes in v1: > *During driver probe: read ALARM_EN, read ALARM_DATA, read RTC_RDATA, > if (ALARM_DATA < RTC_DATA), Trigger the alarm event and clear the alarm settins > Link to v1:https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/20220321090514.4523-1-quic_jianbinz@xxxxxxxxxxx/ > > Changes in original: > link to original: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-rtc/YTusgJlMUdXOKQaL@xxxxxxxxx/ > > Signed-off-by: jianbinz <quic_jianbinz@xxxxxxxxxxx> Please use your full name, both for authorship and signed-off. Your two patches are not sent as a series, and you don't have a cover-letter, which is expected. Please read through go/upstream, and start using b4 for preparing your patches, as this will help you with the practicalities. > --- > drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c | 4 ++++ > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c > index f6b779c12ca7..1b5a96924e57 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pm8xxx.c > @@ -527,6 +527,10 @@ static int pm8xxx_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > if (rc) > return rc; > > + rc = regmap_update_bits(rtc_dd->regmap, rtc_dd->regs->alarm_ctrl2, PM8xxx_RTC_ALARM_CLEAR, 1); Unless I'm mistaken, this line is over 100 characters, please wrap it. Please also Cc: linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on your next version. Regards, Bjorn > + if (rc) > + return rc; > + > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.17.1 >
