On Thu, 30 Nov 2023 18:32:23 +0100, Johan Hovold wrote:
> The PM8921 is an SSBI PMIC but in the binding example it is described
> as being part of an SPMI PMIC while using an SSBI address.
>
> Make the example consistent by using the sibling PM8941 SPMI PMIC
> instead.
>
>
> [...]
Applied, thanks!
[1/1] dt-bindings: rtc: qcom-pm8xxx: fix inconsistent example
commit: 33f4ac16540509af518580abe730d409e8098aca
Best regards,
--
Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
