On 23/03/2023 13:49:42+0530, Dhruva Gole wrote: > Due to the potential failure of enable_irq_wake(), it would be better to > check it and return error if it fails. > > Fixes: b09d633575e5 ("rtc: Introduce ti-k3-rtc") > Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Dhruva Gole <d-gole@xxxxxx> > --- > drivers/rtc/rtc-ti-k3.c | 11 ++++++++++- > 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ti-k3.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ti-k3.c > index ba23163cc042..ef9d7e1cf92e 100644 > --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ti-k3.c > +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ti-k3.c > @@ -630,9 +630,18 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, ti_k3_rtc_of_match_table); > static int __maybe_unused ti_k3_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev) > { > struct ti_k3_rtc *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev); > + int error; This variable is not necessary. > > if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) > - enable_irq_wake(priv->irq); > + error = enable_irq_wake(priv->irq); > + > + if (error) { > + dev_err(dev, > + "failed to enable irq wake on IRQ %d: %d\n", > + priv->irq, error); Please remove this message, this is too verbose and there is no action for the user apart from trying to go to suspend again. > + return error; > + } > + > return 0; > } > > -- > 2.25.1 > -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com