Hi Rafał,
zajec5@xxxxxxxxx wrote on Fri, 24 Feb 2023 08:29:03 +0100:
> From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> NVMEM subsystem looks for fixed NVMEM cells (specified in DT) by
> default. This behaviour made sense in early days before adding support
> for dynamic cells.
>
> With every new supported NVMEM device with dynamic cells current
> behaviour becomes non-optimal. It results in unneeded iterating over DT
> nodes and may result in false discovery of cells (depending on used DT
> properties).
>
> This behaviour has actually caused a problem already with the MTD
> subsystem. MTD subpartitions were incorrectly treated as NVMEM cells.
That's true, but I expect this to be really MTD specific.
A concrete proposal below.
> Also with upcoming support for NVMEM layouts no new binding or driver
> should support fixed cells defined in device node.
I'm not sure I agree with this statement. We are not preventing new
binding/driver to use fixed cells, or...? We offer a new way to expose
nvmem cells with another way than "fixed-offset" and "fixed-size" OF
nodes.
> Solve this by modifying drivers for bindings that support specifying
> fixed NVMEM cells in DT. Make them explicitly tell NVMEM subsystem to
> read cells from DT.
>
> It wasn't clear (to me) if rtc and w1 code actually uses fixed cells. I
> enabled them to don't risk any breakage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx>
> [for drivers/nvmem/meson-{efuse,mx-efuse}.c]
> Acked-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> V2: Fix stm32-romem.c typo breaking its compilation
> Pick Martin's Acked-by
> Add paragraph about layouts deprecating use_fixed_of_cells
> ---
> drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c | 2 ++
> drivers/nvmem/apple-efuses.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/core.c | 8 +++++---
> drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp-scu.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/imx-ocotp.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/meson-efuse.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/meson-mx-efuse.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/microchip-otpc.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/mtk-efuse.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/qcom-spmi-sdam.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/rave-sp-eeprom.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/rockchip-efuse.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/sc27xx-efuse.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/sprd-efuse.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/stm32-romem.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/sunplus-ocotp.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/uniphier-efuse.c | 1 +
> drivers/nvmem/zynqmp_nvmem.c | 1 +
> drivers/rtc/nvmem.c | 1 +
> drivers/w1/slaves/w1_ds250x.c | 1 +
> include/linux/nvmem-provider.h | 2 ++
> 23 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> index 0feacb9fbdac..1bb479c0f758 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/mtdcore.c
> @@ -523,6 +523,7 @@ static int mtd_nvmem_add(struct mtd_info *mtd)
> config.dev = &mtd->dev;
> config.name = dev_name(&mtd->dev);
> config.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + config.use_fixed_of_cells = of_device_is_compatible(node, "nvmem-cells");
I am wondering how mtd specific this is? For me all OF nodes containing
the nvmem-cells compatible should be treated as cells providers and
populate nvmem cells as for each children.
Why don't we just check for this compatible to be present? in
nvmem_add_cells_from_of() ? And if not we just skip the operation.
This way we still follow the bindings (even though using nvmem-cells in
the compatible property to require cells population was a mistake in
the first place, as discussed in the devlink thread recently) but there
is no need for a per-driver config option?
> config.reg_read = mtd_nvmem_reg_read;
> config.size = mtd->size;
> config.word_size = 1;
> @@ -891,6 +892,7 @@ static struct nvmem_device *mtd_otp_nvmem_register(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> config.name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s-%s", dev_name(&mtd->dev), compatible);
> config.id = NVMEM_DEVID_NONE;
> config.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> + config.use_fixed_of_cells = true;
> config.type = NVMEM_TYPE_OTP;
> config.root_only = true;
> config.ignore_wp = true;
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/apple-efuses.c b/drivers/nvmem/apple-efuses.c
> index 9b7c87102104..0119bac43b2c 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/apple-efuses.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/apple-efuses.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ static int apple_efuses_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> struct resource *res;
> struct nvmem_config config = {
> .dev = &pdev->dev,
> + .use_fixed_of_cells = true,
> .read_only = true,
> .reg_read = apple_efuses_read,
> .stride = sizeof(u32),
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/core.c b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> index 174ef3574e07..6783cd8478d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/core.c
> @@ -844,9 +844,11 @@ struct nvmem_device *nvmem_register(const struct nvmem_config *config)
> if (rval)
> goto err_remove_cells;
>
> - rval = nvmem_add_cells_from_of(nvmem);
> - if (rval)
> - goto err_remove_cells;
> + if (config->use_fixed_of_cells) {
> + rval = nvmem_add_cells_from_of(nvmem);
> + if (rval)
> + goto err_remove_cells;
> + }
>
> dev_dbg(&nvmem->dev, "Registering nvmem device %s\n", config->name);
>
Thanks,
Miquèl
