On 18/11/2022 10:22, Matt Ranostay wrote: > Add documentation for the TPS6594x PMIC including its RTC and GPIO > functionalities. > This is a friendly reminder during the review process. It seems my previous comments were not fully addressed. Maybe my feedback got lost between the quotes, maybe you just forgot to apply it. Please go back to the previous discussion and either implement all requested changes or keep discussing them. Thank you. The comment was about proper subject prefix. Drop also redundant, second "DT bindings" from the subject. > Signed-off-by: Matt Ranostay <mranostay@xxxxxx> > --- > .../devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml | 65 +++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..81613bcef39d > --- /dev/null > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/ti,tps6594.yaml > @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@ > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > +%YAML 1.2 > +--- > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mfd/ti,tps6594x.yaml# > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml# > + > +title: TPS6594x Power Management Integrated Circuit (PMIC) > + > +maintainers: > + - Keerthy <j-keerthy@xxxxxx> > + > +properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + - ti,tps6594 tps6594 is the model name? So what was previous tps6594x used also in title? This does not look correct. > + > + reg: > + const: 0x48 > + > + ti,system-power-controller: > + type: boolean > + description: PMIC is controlling the system power. > + > + rtc: > + type: object > + $ref: /schemas/rtc/rtc.yaml# > + unevaluatedProperties: false > + properties: > + compatible: > + const: ti,tps6594-rtc Same problem. > + > + gpio: > + type: object > + unevaluatedProperties: false > + properties: > + compatible: > + const: ti,tps6594x-gpio Not fixed. > + > +additionalProperties: false > + > +required: > + - compatible > + - reg > + > +examples: > + - | > + i2c0 { > + #address-cells = <1>; > + #size-cells = <0>; > + > + pmic: pmic@48 { > + compatible = "ti,tps6594"; > + reg = <0x48>; > + > + rtc { > + compatible = "ti,tps6594-rtc"; > + }; > + > + gpio { > + compatible = "ti,tps6594-gpio"; Does not look like you tested the bindings. Please run `make dt_binding_check` (see Documentation/devicetree/bindings/writing-schema.rst for instructions). Best regards, Krzysztof
